Computational notebooks allow data scientists to express their ideas through a combination of code and documentation. However, data scientists often pay attention only to the code, and neglect creating or updating their documentation during quick iterations. Inspired by human documentation practices learned from 80 highly-voted Kaggle notebooks, we design and implement Themisto, an automated documentation generation system to explore how human-centered AI systems can support human data scientists in the machine learning code documentation scenario. Themisto facilitates the creation of documentation via three approaches: a deep-learning-based approach to generate documentation for source code, a query-based approach to retrieve online API documentation for source code, and a user prompt approach to nudge users to write documentation. We evaluated Themisto in a within-subjects experiment with 24 data science practitioners, and found that automated documentation generation techniques reduced the time for writing documentation, reminded participants to document code they would have ignored, and improved participants' satisfaction with their computational notebook.

Reducing the number of failures in a production system is one of the most challenging problems in technology driven industries, such as, the online retail industry. To address this challenge, change management has emerged as a promising sub-field in operations that manages and reviews the changes to be deployed in production in a systematic manner. However, it is practically impossible to manually review a large number of changes on a daily basis and assess the risk associated with them. This warrants the development of an automated system to assess the risk associated with a large number of changes. There are a few commercial solutions available to address this problem but those solutions lack the ability to incorporate domain knowledge and continuous feedback from domain experts into the risk assessment process. As part of this work, we aim to bridge the gap between model-driven risk assessment of change requests and the assessment of domain experts by building a continuous feedback loop into the risk assessment process. Here we present our work to build an end-to-end machine learning system along with the discussion of some of practical challenges we faced related to extreme skewness in class distribution, concept drift, estimation of the uncertainty associated with the model's prediction and the overall scalability of the system.